Answers for the June Hol Compre Practice: 2004 Promos

From paragraph 1
1. What views does the writer express on the issue of obesity? [2]

From the passage Paraphrased Answers
“It does not seem…fastest-growing fat problem” (lines 1 – 2)
“Well perhaps not. Scare stories are …food and drink to the media.” (lines 3 - 4)
“… killing children … is not … a hallmark of civilization” (lines 5 – 6) While the rate of obesity is increasing rapidly, (1/2)


things are not as serious as they are made out to be. (1/2)


That said, the losing of children to obesity is not an acceptable measure of a developed society. (1)

Comments: This paragraph needs very close and careful reading as many students were not able to really pick up on the complexity of ideas. Many of the answers tended to deal with only a single aspect of what was said and there was a tendency to simplify the issues with points that are not even found in the passage. Excellent answers would have been able to distinguish between what the writer has observed about the fat issue, how this trend could be an exaggeration by the media and lastly, to point out that despite all this, the writer feels that the problem is not a good reflection of progressive society.

Sample of a good answer:
“The writer recognises the increasing frequency of obesity cases in Europe. Although she acknowledges that the situation may have been exaggerated by the media, she considers the problem to be at odds with the advancements of mankind.” ~Nur Azzah Amir Gany 33/04






From paragraph 2
2. a. What is implied by the use of “or else” (lines 8 and 11)? [1]
Answer: It implies that a threat is being made by the government/The government will impose some kind of sanction/penalty on the food and drinks industries. (1)
Comments:
Answers should be put in a meaningful context as far as possible. Please note the words in bold as above.



c. How do the examples used by the writer in lines 15 – 20 develop the argument that the government should take action on obesity? [3]

From the passage Paraphrased Answer
“Mandatory regulations do not seem coercive …”(lines 14 – 15)

…not an assault on human rights… (lines 16)

quaint…aircraft and buses.”
(lines 17 - 18)

“But British children…fatty food lunches…dispense rubbish” (lines 18 – 20) The wearing of crash helmets and seat belts and the ban on smoking in planes and buses have been forced upon people not to restrict them but to protect them. (1)

They do not see these as a violation of their human rights. (1)


Moreover, these restrictions have been generally accepted as beneficial/people recognize these as benefits. (1)

Therefore, the writer feels that it is perfectly reasonable to regulate against obesity for the benefits it would bring. (1)
Accept any 3 of the above points
Comments: For each point made from these examples, remember link them back to the point of why the government should take action on obesity. Lastly, for questions 1 and 2, please avoid lifting especially of key words/ideas.




4. “Never, outside the Garden of Eden, has so much significance been invested in a free apple” (lines 27 – 28). What is the writer’s intention in saying this? [1]

To be witty/To mock the government’s efforts/the writer is being sarcastic/to question the government’s actions/to criticize or doubt the government. (1)

Comments: Only a small percentage of the entire cohort managed a coherent answer. This question required students to go beyond rephrasing stock sentences and was one of the few that truly tested one’s understanding of the writer’s message and how she uses tone to make a point. Biblical references were not particularly useful for this question and what students needed to do was make some reference to the sarcasm and the writer’s dismissal of the government’s half-hearted efforts.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Answers for the June Hol Compre Practice: 2003 Promos

2. In paragraph 2, the writer says that Malthus’ prediction still stirs much debate today. Explain the two viewpoints that it generates. [4]

LIFTED PHRASES PARAPHRASE
 Basically, the Pollyannas of this world say that Malthus was wrong (l.

 the population has continued to grow, economies remain robust (l.

 and famines in Biafra and Ethiopia are more aberrations than signs of the future. (l.9–11)

 The Pollyannas say the more the merrier; (l.13-14)

 Cassandras reply that Malthus was right (l.

 but techno-fixes have postponed the day of reckoning. (l. 12-13)

 the Cassandras say that is already twice as many as can be supported in middle-class comfort (l.

 and the world is running out of arable land and fresh water. (l. 14-16) A

 One group feels that Malthus was incorrect [1/2]


 despite population increase, [1/2] economies in general have been strong / robust. [1/2]

 Famines that occur are exceptions. [1/2]


 In fact, the more people the better for the world. [1/2]

 The other group feels that Malthus was correct. [1/2]

 However, technology has delayed the outcomes of his predictions. [1/2]

 Furthermore, they see that the world has already more people than it can comfortably support [1/2]


 and its resources are being depleted rapidly. [1/2]

Any 8 out of 9 points


Mark range: 1½ – 4
Language Marks: 4 (Combined with Q3 & Q7)

COMMENTS:
Strengths
 This is a straightforward direct question that requires students to clearly identify two view points with regards to Malthus’ Theory. Except for a minority who managed to get the view points mixed up, most were able to scored decent content marks.
 There were some scripts which showed good grasp of English/vocabulary and managed to paraphrase the key words/phrases smoothly.



Weaknesses
 Weaker students tend to lapse into past tense for everything, e.g., “The writer said ….”
 Lifting was quite common. Despite the absence of explicit instructions in the question itself, students must remember the general instructions at the beginning of the answer booklet.
 Some answers were too wordy or repetitive.

Marked by: Mr Peck CS





3. In paragraph 5, why does the writer say that agriculture ‘removed the Malthusian lid in one fell swoop’? (l. 40) [3]

LIFTED PHRASES PARAPHRASE
 Agriculture altered how we related to the natural world … (l. 39)

 … liberating us from the confines of the local ecosystem … (l. 39)



 … one fell swoop (l. 40)


 The constraints that Malthus predicted do not apply today. [1]

 Modern agricultural practices/ technology have/has freed us from our dependence on the natural environment for our needs [1]

 all at once [1]

Mark range: 1 – 3
Language Marks: 4 (Combined with Q2 & Q7)

COMMENTS:
Strengths
 Only a few students managed to address all parts of the quoted phrase, especially “in one fell swoop”.

Weaknesses
 As with Q2, weaker students tend to lapse into past tense for everything, e.g., “The writer said ….” despite the wording in the question - “… why does the writer say…”
 Some answers even concluded that agriculture actually reinforced the Malthusian Theory.
 Lifting was quite common.
 Time management appeared to be a problem for some as there were some scripts which left this question unattempted.
 Some answers were too wordy or repetitive.

Marked by: Mr Peck CS



5. Explain the phrase ‘our rampant success in living outside the world’s ecosystems has put them all, and thus ourselves, in jeopardy’ (ll. 71-72). [2 + 1 lang]

LIFTED PHRASES PARAPHRASE
 our rampant success in living outside the world’s ecosystems has put them all, and thus ourselves, in jeopardy (l. 71-72)

 We have managed to live highly independently [1/2]

 of our natural environment. [1/2]

 However, our great achievement in doing so/ even though we have thrived [1/2], this
 has endangered the existence of these resources and our own existence [1/2].

 Explanation of irony – a situation that has an unexpected ending [Bonus 1/2]

Mark range: 0 – 2

COMMENTS:
 Many students just re-arranged the phrase and then went on to write about something else.
 Lifting important words like ‘rampant success’, ‘jeopardy’
 Most however, could at least explain that man is no longer dependent on the natural environment.

Marked by: Ms Faye Tan

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Answers for the June Hol Compre Practice: 2002 Promos

From Paragraph 2:
2. According to the writer, how has moral hypochondria become a hindrance to science? Use your own words as far as possible. [3 ½]

Lifted Phrases Paraphrased Answers
• Disturbed the development of our institutions (l.12)
• Public [has] reacted with blind, irrational fear (l.14)
• [no] clear, considered, decisive action (l.18)


• setting up of taboos around emotionally charged words and symbols (l.19)


• development of our institutions becomes hazy and possibly perverted when panic takes over (l.20) • Hindered / obstructed our progress in science [ ½ ]
• The people have responded with unreasonable / illogical terror [ ½ ]
• A lack of obvious action that has been deliberated over [ ½ ]
• fear that overcomes or overpowers
[ ½ ]
• Words and signs with certain connotations are suddenly deemed unacceptable/ creation of sensitive issues around certain terms [1]
• The progress of science has grown to be unclear and even warped / twisted [ ½ ]

Comments

• This question was very badly answered and most students did not seem to understand the meaning of the phrase ‘moral hypochondria.’
• One problem that was apparent was that many students wrote lengthy and irrelevant material from the paragraph, essentially copying and rephrasing things that they did not understand. The average student spent at least 3 lines devoted to the Russians, Congress and professors at the University of California. Students should realize there is a difference between examples given to substantiate a position and the statements that delineate the position.
• Lifting was extremely common for the phrase involving the setting up of taboos. Less than 1/10 of students managed to get more than 2 ½ marks for content here.
• Lack of length in answers (many answers were only 3 lines) also deflated the number of marks awarded for language use.
• Many students did not understand the meaning of the word taboo or misspelt superstition.
• In general, the way students answered this question regarding taboos and the real objective regarding our institutions betrays the fact that most did not understand what the passage was talking about. Students tended to score mostly by noting that our institutions were interrupted in their development and the public reacted with fear.




From paragraph 1
5. Identify and explain the irony pointed out by the writer [2]

Lifted Phrases Paraphrased Answers
• science and technology have had a beneficial impact on our lives (l.1)
• labour-saving/cut down time on actual physical labour (l.3-4)
• but has increased considerably the mental effort that modern occupations require (1.6)
• gives rise to stress, strain and fatigue (l.7) • science and technology have brought positive effects on society
• they reduce time and effort spent on manual work
• however, greater concentration is necessary when working today
• resulting in tiredness and tension or psychological disorders. Despite this most people prefer to do mental rather than physical work

Comments:

• There are two ironies in this answer. 1) greater tiredness and tension and 2) the fact that despite this, people prefer to do mental rather than physical work. Only one irony would suffice although some students put two.
• Lifting. An explanation of the first part of the answer, but lifting the second part of the answer and vice versa results in the loss of a mark.
• Students put down the fact that mental effort was increased. This stands to reason and is not ironic.
• The idea that mental work is more satisfying is not ironic.
• Some students quoted directly from the text, which can only be taken as lifting. This should be avoided at all costs.
• Some students had the wrong noun, verb agreement. For example science and technology has brought instead of have brought.

Mark Scheme for Qn 5: 2 (content) + 2 (lang) = 4 marks (total)
Marked by Mr Bernard Walker

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Answers for the June Hol Compre Practice: 2001 Promos

Hi

I hope you have spent some time trying out the papers. Here's the answers!

2001 Promos
From Paragraph 5
3a. Explain what the writer means by “ours is not a story of a lone hero species’ linear struggle to succeed, but one of repeated evolutionary experiments” (line 37). [2]
From the passage Suggested paraphrase
• ours is not a story of a lone hero species’ linear struggle to succeed (line 37)


• but one of repeated evolutionary experiments (line 38). • The writer means that the history of mankind is not about a single type of people [1/2] trying hard to survive / going through tribulations to survive [1/2]
• but that there were several species undergoing a continuous / on-going / recurrent [1/2] trial and error / natural selection process [1/2]

Comments
- "Evolution" is different from "mutation" / "mutilation", and the concept of "change" is too simplistic to adequately explain it.
- There is no such word as "evoluting". The correct form is "evolving".
- Students discussed the process of tool making and basically paraphrased the whole paragraph without checking if it answered the question!
- Some students stated that "only the fittest will survive". While this is not wrong, it does not explain the meaning of the quote in the context of the paragraph, ie. simply, there were other species around.

Student’s answer:
“Human evolutionary history encompasses the birth of new species, competition and cohabitation among existing ones who are constantly adapting to new surroundings and conditions. It does not merely tell of a particular species’ fight for survival.” (modified answer) (Fong Wei Li, 20/01)



From Paragraph 1
6. Explain the "twist" mentioned in line 9. [2]
From the passage Suggested paraphrase
• The owners … are suing to get their chimp back (line 7)
• The chimpanzee… is the subject of a bitter wrangle between Los Angeles city officials…The former seized the animal and put him in an ape sanctuary to stop him escaping and biting citizens (line 2 – 6)
• lawyers for the U.S. Animal Legal Defence Fund have applied to be made Moe’s guardian (line 9)
• There was a legal tussle [1/2]

• However a turn of events happened when the U.S. Animal Legal Defence Fund filed for its custody, further complicating the issue. [1/2]

• What started as a two-party dispute over a pet has become a three-way [1/2]
• contention involving issues of animal rights. [1/2]

Comments:
a. Very few good answers. Few could not tell with any certainty what the ”twist” was.
b. Many half-answered responses.
c. Altogether, very disappointing.

Model answer: Cai Lingfen (02/01):
There was originally a two –party court tussle, between Moe’s owners and Los Angeles city officials. This was further exacerbated by the entry of the Animal Legal Defence Fund to petition on behalf of the chimpanzee. By entering into the fray as the third party, they highlighted the need to have a set of rights for animals as well as humans.



From Paragraph 3
7. What does the writer mean by “ throw their intellectual weight behind a bid” (lines 23 - 24)? [2]
From the passage Suggested paraphrase
• Authors, scientists and philosophers are combining to throw their intellectual weight behind a bid to establish an animals’ Bill of Rights for all sentient creatures (lines 23 – 25) • The phrase means to lend support to the cause [1/2], with the intellectual elite [1/2] using the academic influence / authority and the reputation they have earned in their respective fields of expertise [1/2] to push the Bill through. [1/2]
Comments
i. Students should already know by now that a point is worth 1/2 a mark, thus this question would require them to provide 4 points.
ii. Students then should decide where these 4 points would come from. These points are paraphrases of the following:
• authors, scientists and philosophers
• throw their weight
• their intellectual weight
• behind a bid to establish an animal's Bill of Rights
iii. Many students are not able to paraphrase 'intellectual weight' and they made no attempt whatsoever to give a generic term for 'authors, scientists and philosophers'. Thus there was rampant lifting. This is such a shame because the paraphrases for the latter point are very manageable.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Analysis of Questions Lesson

Dear Students

Please post up and share your revised points though the comments to this post.

Cheers
Ms Goh

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Extra Compre Practice 2 (GP Practice Series)

Hi

Do work on the following 'more difficult questions'. I'll post up the answers on the 1st week of the June holidays:

Promos 2001: 3a, 6, 7
Promos 2002: 2, 5
Promos 2003: 2, 3, 4
Promos 2004: 1, 2a, 2c, 4

Work hard and smart! Look for patterns in the questions & corresponding answers.

As you do the compre, you will become a MORE SENSITIVE, MORE SENSIBLE and a MORE SAVVY reader. You will also become a CRITICAL THINKER who will NEVER be hoodwinked, be lied to or be manipulated!

Go plant the seeds of success :)

Cheers
Ms Goh

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Vocab for Tone, Attitude

Tone/Attitude Vocabulary

The nuances of these words are important!

Anger

accusatory
belligerent
bitter
disappointed
disgusted
furious
grouchy
incredulous
indignant
inflammatory
insulting
irritated
outraged
petulant
querulous
savage
sullen
threatening
wrathful
Humor/Sarcasm (Satire)

belittling
caustic
comical
cynical
facetious
flippant
haughty
insulting
ironic
irreverent
malicious
mock-heroic
mocking
obsequious
ribald
ridiculing
sarcastic
scornful
taunting Sadness/Fear

apprehensive
concerned
despairing
elegiac
foreboding
gloomy
hopeless
melancholy
morose
mournful
pessimistic
regretful
serious
sober
solemn
somber
tragic


Tranquility

calm
hopeful
meditative
nostalgic
optimistic
peaceful
relaxed
reminiscent
sentimental
serene
soothing
spiritual
staid

Romance

affectionate
amorous
compassionate
erotic
fanciful
Happiness

amiable
amused
cheery
contented
ecstatic
elated
enthusiastic
exuberant
hopeful
jovial
joyful
jubilant
lighthearted
optimistic
positive
sanguine
Arrogance

authoritative
boastful
bold
condescending
contemptuous
critical
disdainful
haughty
insolent
judgmental
mordant
patronizing
pompous
pretentious
supercilious
Neutral

Apathetic
Authoritative
Candid
Cautionary
Ceremonial
Clinical
Detached
Didactic
Distant
Erudite
Factual
Forman
Forthright
Informative
Instructive
Matter-of-fact
Objective
Restrained ideal
intimate
loving
lustful
lyurical
reflective
sensual
tender
whimsical

Logic

argumentative
didactic
doubtful
explanatory
informative
persuasive
rational
thoughtful

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Essay Topic Sentences

Please reply to this post in the following format:

NAMES:

Paper: 2008/2009 JCT
Question: 1/2/3...
Question:

TS1: alsdfjlkjf
EG1:asfka;ld fj

TS2: al;sdjf;ljk
EG2: a;ldjf;la

TS3: aslkdf;lakj
EG3: LKWSJDA

COUNTER-ARGUMENT:a;ldf ;lk j;l
Counter-COUNTER-ARGUMENT: adfjlak j

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Compre Answers for JCT practices

Compre Answers

2003 JCT

3)
linear( line5 5): The writer i s suggesting that writing in literature often runs in one direction/ follows the same (predictable) course/ has a beginning, middle and end /

constraints(line 55) This, he sees as limiting.

Freed (line 55): In contrast , those who participate in 'Myst' have more options / can make choices that take them in different directions/ have more routes to take/ can determine their own course of discovery. And therefore have a greater sense of freedom/ feel less controlled by the author.

7)
What is the writer's intention in declaring, "Long live the page!" (line 59)?
He is affirming that the page will continue to rule (1) as the medium for presenting / formatting /engaging with words and pictures, but that it will be incorporated into the screen (1)

or that the page is a legacy/ that which will be passed on/ adapted/ developed (1) so that it satisfies both readers of traditional books and those who are more at home with the screen (1).
Given1 mark only if it is simply pointed out that the traditional page will become the interchangeable page of both book and screen. (Lift:" TV that we read and books that we watch.")

Atthough some answers had the correct meaning, rnost answers were written in inaccurate English. Language marks were deducted for the expression 'trying to say" because the writer is succeeding in saying what he wants to. Quite a few students wrote of the page housing the screen, when it is the screen which
houses the page.

2004 JCT

1)
• It suggests tremendous / remarkable / amazing change. [1]
• Our great-grandparents would have been stunned by the changes. [1/2]
• The changes were shocking. [0]

2)
Lifted Answer Paraphrased Answer
1) We live in a favoured age but do not feel favoured. (line 9-10)


2)
The incidence of clinical melancholy has been rising in eerie synchronisation with rising prosperity. (line 10-12)
or
We should be glad that society is creating not only the prosperity but also the leisure that enable people by the millions to feel depressed. (line 14-16)


- Although we live in an era where life is better, we do not think that we are better-off. (a more general explanation of “favoured” is required.)

- Although we are wealthier, we increasingly have the perception that life is difficult/miserable, which is ironic/odd as one would not expect this to happen.
or
- It is absurd/ironic that one is miserable when one has the opportunity to relax/rest.
- Or it is ironic that this freedom from work gives us the chance to wallow in despondency.
- Or it is ironic that we should be pleased to have the time to be miserable as it is obviously a negative experience.


5)
What attitude to possessions is implied by the writer’s repeated use of the word “stuff”(line 49-53) to describe them? [1]
• A dismissive attitude is implied / Possessions are not viewed as important.

2005 JCT

8) “How can today’s teens truly experience this tortured rite of passage when marketers seek them out relentlessly and programmers understand them so well?”(l. 19 -21)
Explain, in your own words as far as possible, what the writer is saying here. [3]

FROM THE PASSAGE PARAPHRASE
 How can today’s teens truly experience this tortured rite of passage (l. 19–20)  It is an essential part of being an adolescent to feel lonely and misunderstood [1]
 but it is difficult for teenagers to feel this [1]
 … when marketers seek them out relentlessly and programmers understand them so well? (l. 20–21)  because the producers of goods and the mass media are determined / finely tuned to analyse and exploit/ cater to their every need [1]


Comments:
 A large majority of the scripts scored zero for this as there was a lack of understanding of the question. Many students went off the course talking about the search for identity, how talent scouts look for teenagers endlessly, providing them with jobs and salaries, and how they then do not need care, concern and understanding from their parents.
 Also, the “How can today’s teens…” phrase does not imply that the present teenagers are complaining about the lack of understanding. Rather, it is a statement rephrased as a question, saying that teens nowadays cannot/ do not go through the essential lonely and misunderstood stage of adolescence
 The gist of the second part – ‘marketers seeks them out relentlessly and programmers understand them so well’ – is not about them helping the teens to solve problems /providing solutions. It is about them having the teens well analyzed and catering to their needs.

Example of a better answer
The writer means that the period of adolescence is normally marked by a pronounced sense of being lonely, that teens will beg for someone to understand them. However, today’s teens cannot experience this moment in its true entirety due to the many marketers seeking them out voraciously and programmers who understand their every want and need.
Paul-Mathew Lim Cheng Zhong


JCT 2006

From paragraph 3
1. Explain what the writer means when she uses the metaphor “henhouse chickens” (line 22) to describe the children of today. Use your own words as far as possible. [3]

Lifts Paraphrased Answer








• “plump from lack of exercise and (line 22)

• without the resilience and (lines 22-23)

• initiative of free-range kids in the past” (line 23)
• Like chickens confined within a henhouse, children are cooped up at home. [1]

[1 mark each for any 2 of the following points]
• They become obese from being deprived of play and exercise. [1]
• They are not given the opportunity to build up their ability to withstand hardship. [1]
• They do not have the freedom to develop an enterprising spirit / cultivate their resourcefulness. [1]

Comments:
• This is a question that tests students’ ability to explain a metaphor, hence answers without any reference to the “henhouse chickens” would lose one mark straight away.
• Children “without the resilience” do not necessarily refer to children who are completely dependent on their parents for everything in life. Hence, answers that convey “a lack of self-sufficiency” as an explanation for “without the resilience” are not given credit.


From paragraph 4
2. What is the writer’s attitude when she says “Have we gone too far?” (line 29)? Explain your answer. [2]

Lifts Paraphrased Answer

• “While it’s natural for a parent to want to protect their children from danger, you have to wonder: Have we gone too far?” (lines 28-29)
• The writer expresses doubt / disapproval.
(The writer expresses a doubtful / disparaging / disapproving attitude). [1]
• This is because she feels that parents have excessively sheltered their children from risks / although parents understandably shelter their children from risks, they should not overdo it. [1]


Comments:
• Answers must state the attitude of the writer first before going on to explain the reason, or no mark will be given.
• A writer’s attitude is similar to his tone, and does not refer to his feelings or thoughts. Hence, “the writer thinks/feels that parents have gone overboard” is not an attitude, but “the writer disapproves of how parents have gone overboard with parenting” is.
• The following is an example of an answer that meets the requirements of the question:
The writer’s attitude is questioning and doubtful. The writer wants to bring across the point that while it is normal to want to protect their children, some parents are getting affected by paranoia and are sheltering their children too much. ~ Janice Huang, 31/06

From paragraph 7
3. Explain in your own words as far as possible what is meant by ”the kid gloves came off” (line 41). [2]

Lifts Paraphrased Answer
• Literal

• Contextual • ”Kid gloves” are protective garments and taking off these gloves is to remove the protection. [1]

• The writer is saying that parents should stop treating children as dainty, vulnerable youngsters unable to deal with any real or harsh truth / accept rough treatment. Or stop mollycoddling them [1]
[Accept any answer with the same general meaning.]


Comments:
• Just like Question 2, the metaphor of the kid gloves being taken off must be explained. Students must learn to always present the literal meaning of the tested phrase before explaining its use in the context.

• The following is an example of an answer that meets the requirements of the question:
Gloves are meant for protection and prevent exposure. By saying that “the kid gloves came off”, [the writer] means that it is time for parents to stop overprotecting their kids, allow them to be exposed to the outside world and do things by themselves. ~ Tay Huimin, 24/06


JCT 2007
1. How does Alpert’s stand contradict the question posed in paragraph 1? [3]

LIFTED PHRASES PARAPHRASED ANSWER
 Even so, I am against censorship (l. 4–5)


 What could seemingly be more wholesome than newsstands cleansed of the gleeful celebrations of perverse sexual acts or it adults-only cinemas were shuttered? Little would be lost, really. (l. 2–4)  Alpert is not in favour of / does not support censorship. [1]

 and this contradicts/ is in direct opposite to the potential benefits/ positive effects censorship can bring [1]

 in particular, greater public decency / a morally upright society [1]


Comments:
 This question requires the contradiction to be shown explicitly – through the use of phrases like “in spite of”, “despite”, etc.
 In many cases, the contradiction was not evident. Students generally rambled on about WHY the author does not support censorship, summarising all of the author’s views in the passage which are completely redundant to this question.
 Note that answers are NOT repeated across questions. So if your answers to one question are the same as those for another, you have made a mistake somewhere.
 Note that if the question specifies a particular paragraph, then your answer must come from that paragraph.
 Some students even referred to passage 1. (????!!!!)
 There was a lot of lifting (just because “use your own words” is not in the question?). Quite often, the examples given by the author in the question posed in paragraph 1 were cited – wholesome, newsstands, adult-only cinemas – with no attempt at paraphrasing.
 Note that precision is essential – “Few negative effects” is not the same as saying there are benefits


8) LIFTED
 pornography takes but a minute portion of its attention (l. 53)


 It is at worst a flea that bites an elephant (l. 53–54)


 It does take enormous effort to do something about it (l. 54–55)


 …and in the long run, it is no more productive than flailing at windmills. (l.55–56)

PARAPHRASED
 Pornography only occupies an extremely small fraction of one’s mind/ is a trivial or minor issue to people. [1]

 Its impact can be considered inconsequential/ unimpressive. [1]
*Note: must emphasise the impact.

 However, any attempt to eradicate it/ solve the problem requires a great amount of energy/hard work [1]

 And the outcome of attempting to eradicate pornography is often insignificant and ineffective [1]


Comments:
 Once again, there was a lack of precision in many answers, eg. many students wrote “it is trivial so it is easy for people to ignore and forget”, which does not translate to “insignificant impact”.
 Misinterpretation of the word ‘minute’ – eg. “Pornography takes up only a minute of one’s focus.” (??!!)

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

2002 JC1 JCT Compre

TEMASEK JUNIOR COLLEGE
YEAR 1 JUNE COMMON TEST 2002
PAPER 2 MARKERS’ REPORT

From paragraph 1
1) What is the author’s purpose in mentioning the nine-year old girl? [2]

Text Rephrase
(inferred) as proof / to cite an example / as evidence (½)
people all over the world rely on nature (ll. 1 – 2) that herbal remedies has global appeal OR is
widely accepted (½)
(inferred from rest of the para.) and is effective even against terminal illnesses like cancer (1)

Comments:
• Many students merely stated the plight of the nine-year old girl. The question is not concerned with who the nine-year old girl is but rather what purpose she serves as part of the writer’s message in the paragraph. (See example) Students must infer from what is written. A sensitivity to text structure (which can be honed through regular reading or writing) will be useful in answering this question.

Example:
“The nine-year-old girl completely recovered from leukaemia with the help of a drug made from periwinkle. She underwent two years of chemotherapy with the help from the plant as a chemotherapeutic drug.”


From paragraph 3
2) Give three reasons why there is little development in drugs from plants. Number your reasons 1,2 and 3. Use your own words as far as possible. [3]

Text Rephrase
1. costs as much as 500 million U.S. dollars (l. 24) 1. It is extremely expensive to develop new drugs from plants which are sanctioned by the FDA (1)
2. manufacturers found route from plant to safe, reliable pill is difficult and unpredictable (l. 25) 2. The development process is too tedious (½) and there is no guarantee that it will be successful (½)
3. And even in industrialized countries where scientifically formulated drugs are readily available – Americans spend 103 billion dollars on retail prescription drugs (ll.28-30) 3. Majority of people in industrialized countries (which have the funds to develop herbal drugs) prefer to buy prescription drugs (1)
(inferred reasons) There is little profit to be made from developing herbal medicine as compared to scientifically formulated drugs (1)

Comments:
• Students are generally able to provide at least 2 reasons for this question. The third reason requires a bit more inference and many do not bother to think further but merely paraphrased “limited incentive to base drug development on plants” (l. 26) This answer simply begs the question. We advise students to base their answers on the paragraph stated although in this case, we did give credit to students who mentioned that a possible reason could also be due to FDA’s strict requirements on sanctioning herbal medicine although some might argue that this came at the end of paragraph 2.


Mark Scheme : (Q1) 2 + (Q2) 3 + 2 (lang)= 7 marks
Marker : Mr Tony Tan







From paragraph 3
3a) According to the writer, why do people in developing countries turn to herbal medicine? [2]

Text Rephrase
rely on the healing power (l.27) They believe that herbal medicine is effective (½ )
nothing else affordable (l.28) Herbal medicine is cheap as compared to formulated drugs (½)
or available (l. 28) They can access / obtain these herbal drugs easily (½ )
(inferred) These people have a long tradition of seeking herbal remedies for their illnesses (½ )


3b) Suggest one possible reason why people in developed countries spend so much on
prescription drugs. Use your own words as far as possible. [1]

Text Rephrase



Inferred
They have faith in scientifically-proven medicine (½)
They are affluent and are willing to spend or pay high prices for these drugs (½)
These drugs are found in many places in developed countries and this contributes to its overall sales (½)
They have developed a reliance on these drugs due to their stressful lifestyle (½)

Comments:
• The entire question 3 is a straightforward question. Therefore, any answer using the words “available” and “ affordable” will not obtain any marks. How far should you paraphrase? (See example) Most students are able to get at least 2 of the points in the answer unless they lifted directly from the text. Quite alarmingly, there were also quite a number of students who actually thought scientifically-proven drugs and prescription drugs are 2 entirely different types of drugs.

Example:
“…the plants used for healing are ubiquitous”

Mark Scheme: (Q3a) 2 + (Q 3b) 1(content) + 2 (lang)= 5 marks
Marker : Mr Tony Tan


From paragraph 4
4) In the context, how apt is the writer’s analogy of the radio? [1]

Text Rephrase

ll. 36 – 40 The analogy is apt because isolating the compound in the plant responsible for producing a cure is as difficult as trying to disassemble a radio and identifying the part of the radio that is producing the sound. (1)

Comments:
• As this is a figurative language question, students would be expected to know what an analogy was – a linguistic device that makes use of another similar but simpler, more accessible object/process/idea to explain a complex one – and at least make reference to both objects/processes/ideas. This was not seen as quite a number of students happily just describe the radio and its parts etc.

• Time management as reflected in the length of the answer appeared to be a problem as some students insisted on writing a lot, even beyond the stipulated length.

• There was some leeway in accepting or rejecting the radio analogy.
It is very apt as attempting to determine which chemical or chemicals are responsible for the plant’s healing effects are as difficult and tedious as disassembling an entire radio to search for the part that produces the sound.
(Timothy Lin Xianyang, 10/02)

I think the analogy is not very apt because a plant’s medicinal effect is a result of more complex bio-chemical processes than the mechanical functioning of sound-production in a radio.
(Kharkar Prajakta Prashani, 08/02)



From paragraph 5
5) What does the writer mean by “placebo effect”? [1]

Text Rephrase
they take them and feel better whether or not the substance had any effect l.45,46 They believe that traditional medicines would make them feel better even though the medicine may not really have any impact. (1)

Comments:
• Heavy lifting, even to the extent of copying out in entirety lines 44-46. Students should realize that copying is a job best left to photocopiers and that in GP, they are expected to show command of language (and, less applicable for Paper 2, other than the application question, an awareness of the world around them). Compared to answers like the one that follows, those that made no or minimal attempt to paraphrase were heavily penalized.

The writer means that a psychological effect exists that helps people who consume such medicine feel better solely because they believe it would make them feel better and not because of any healing property of the medicine itself.
(Timothy Lin Xianyang, 10/02)



From paragraphs 6 and 7
6) What two things about herbal remedies are recognised by the medical community? [1]

Text Rephrase
many plant-derived materials… have been proved to have important biological effects l.53,54 - many plants are of use/helpful to the body in many significant ways (½ )
not be in fundamental conflict with mainstream medicine l.52-3 - works in tandem with conventional medicine (½ )
OR
insists on scientific testing … before (believing) in an herbal remedy l.55,56 - Although their efficacy must first be proven scientifically / clinically before their use can be accepted (½ )
people use hundreds of plants, not all of which have been tested by science l.56-7 - it must be conceded that many people still and will continue to use herbs even though most are not scientifically proven (½ )

Comments:
• Lifting of key words and even almost entire sentences was quite widespread. In addition, some students insisted on labeling their answers (1) and (2) as per Q 2. At the other extreme, there were also a number of students who did not attempt this question for various reasons.

Mark Scheme : (Q4) 1 + (Q5) 1 + (Q 6) 1(content) + 2 (lang) = 5 marks
Marker : Mr Peck Chee Siong






Read Passage B in the separate insert and then answer the questions below.
From paragraphs 1 and 2
7a) Using your own words, say what the two paragraphs reveal about the shoppers. [2]

Text Rephrase
Enticing l.1 - easily tempted
watch cellulite melt away l.3 - gullible
- look for quick answers
you’ve seen it on Dateline … l.5,6 - easily influenced by media
- uncritical, unthinking, credulous
- curious
Desperate shoppers practically rioted l.8 - beauty / image-conscious
- influenced by herd instinct
- suffered from low self-esteem
sales reached $5m l.11 - willing to spend
(Award ½ mk for any point or bullet up to a maximum of 4 points.)

7b) What do the paragraphs reveal about the nature of advertising? [1]
Advertising is:
A - powerful
B - effective, persuasive
C - exploitative of the insecurities of consumers
D - deceptive / misleading
E - unscrupulous in the way that it makes bold claims and promises to sell products and services
(Award ½ mk for any point up to a maximum of 2 points.)

Comments:
• The main problem was repetition of answer as well as unnecessary details like the “rioting” and names of shows mentioned.
• Slavish lifting for such short questions did not help matters.

Mark Scheme : (Q7a) 2 + (Q 7b) 1(content) + 2 (lang)= 5 marks
Marker : Mr Peck Chee Siong


8) Give the meaning of each of the following words as they are used in the passage. You may write the answer in a word or a short phrase. [5]


9) According to the writer, why is it important to regulate the sale and use of herbal remedies? Using materials from paragraphs 2 – 9, write your answer in no more than 150 words. Use your own words as far as possible.

Mark Scheme: 8 (content) + 3 (lang) = 11 marks
Marker: Mrs Bernice Yong

Comments
1) Too much lifting!
2) Repetition of ideas occurred. ( “herbs were poisonous” / “might have dangerous effects on people’s health” / “might compromise people’s health” all mean the same thing )
3) ‘Padding’, which does not garner one mark, was often used. Eg. ‘It is extremely important to regulate the sale and use of herbal remedies because...'
4) There were problems with using the wrong word-form. Eg. ‘proof’ (noun) vs ‘prove’ (verb), ‘belief’ (noun) vs ‘believe’ (verb)
5) The subject of the sentence was not consistently used. Eg. ‘Manufacturers advertise without proof to substantiate its claim.’
6) Students could summarise long titles. Eg. ‘The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act in 1994 was passed…’ could become ‘A law was passed…’.
7) Students need to read the question carefully. The issue was about ‘herbal remedies’ in general, but specific drugs like Cellasene or Osteo Bi-Flex were cited. Learn to extract information to address the question properly.
8) Misrepresentation of facts. ‘track potential illnesses’ was paraphrased as ‘detect possible diseases.’
9) Inaccuracy of phrasing. Eg. The phrase ‘studies of small size’ was paraphrased as ‘minute analysis’ (detailed analysis).

Text Paraphrase
-More than a third of the population now relies on herbs to treat everything… [ A ] -many people are using herbs as cures for diseases. (1)
-audacious marketing strategies… aggressive tactics… sales reaches $5mil
[ B1 ]
-engaged in deceptive advertising…misled consumers… endorsed the unproven dietary supplement [ B2 ]
-despite unproven benefits and potential for harm… attracted many customers with promise [ B3 ] -the sale of herbal remedies can be increased through forceful advertising (1/2)
-advertisers have been known to use untruthful / false sales gimmicks (1/2)


-consumers are easily persuaded / influenced / gullible / curious by persuasive advertisements (1/2)
-no published researched support
-extraordinary claims [ C1 ]
-only three studies… none published in peer-reviewed journal [ C2 ]
-only a mere 75 patients raises questions regarding product’s efficacy [ C3 ]
-some data made available to press by manufacturer [ C4 ] -there is no concrete evidence to support cures or remedies advertised. (1)
-scientific evidence is minimal / not endorsed by fellow practitioners (1/2)
-limited study / sample size (1/2)

-information is released selectively to the media to mislead them (1/2)
-safety concerns arisen…multiple complications… insomnia and menstrual irregularity [ D1 ] -if unchecked, the herbal medicine may endanger the users’ health (1)
-if firms make dramatic, unsubstantiated claims… with impunity they have enormous power to generate demand for their products [ E1 ] -firms may become emboldened to perpetuate their deception if their unscrupulous practices are allowed to continue unchecked (1)
-Congress (allows) companies to peddle products… as long as they do not claim they treat a specific disease [ F1 ]
-many food ingredients are closely regulated by the Food and Drug Administration, but food supplements – such as herbal remedies, botanical extracts and amino acids – are not. [ F2 ] -loopholes in the law allow companies to sell products as long as they do not profess to cure a particular ailment (1)
-as food is strictly regulated by the authorities, herbs, which are similar to it, should be too / should be similar standards for food and herbs (1/2)
-freeing manufacturers from any obligation to document safety or efficacy of products… (and) any responsibility to track potentially life-threatening side effects [ G1 ] -as producers are not legally bound to monitor the safety and potency of the herbal medicine, those which are poisonous continue to be used. (1)

Modified answer:
Without regulation, brazen advertisement is allowed success as people choose ignorance. Fantastic claims can be largely unfounded, while research that has been done by the company can have little scientific acclaim. The drug’s validity is thus in doubt. In fact, well-founded research often disproves such research. The drugs are even possibly damaging to the human body. However, people may still purchase them, due only to strong advertising. Advertisements may even be trickery; this is exponentially harmful in societies dependent in large numbers on herbal treatment. A Congress ruling in 1994 further allowed food supplements to pass uninspected, and released firms from the need to record adverse side-effects. This could have many undesirable consequences. Some of these herbs may even be disguised poisons.
(Andy Huang, 35/02)

10) Passages A and B describe the attitude of the public towards herbal remedies. If the herbal remedy market is well-established in your country, will the people there react in the same manner?

Draw appropriate information from the passages. However, you should rely largely on your own relevant ideas and experience in order to justify your answer.

Mark Scheme: 8 (content) + 3 (lang) = 11 marks
Marker: Ms Norsheha

Comments:
1. Failure to address the requirements of the question.
The Question is NOT
• What will the people's reaction be if the herbal remedy market is well-established?
• What will the people's reaction be if the herbal remedy market is well-established in your country?
• What will the people's reaction be to aggressive advertising?
• What will the people's reaction be to slimming products?

Thus, to get beyond 2 marks for content, students should:
• identify “your country” and bring in the unique characteristics or psyche of the local people as well as add examples to give that local flavour;
• identify the various reactions raised in the passage and make an attempt to show whether the local people react in a similar or different manner.
• focus on the reaction to “herbal products” and not advertisements or slimming pills in general.

2. Students should not confine their response to one point only (e.g. reaction to slimming pills).

3. Responses should be balanced and show some evaluation.

4. Students should not waste time and effort developing and narrating an example at great length (e.g a whole paragraph or even two, on the whole Andrea de Cruz and Pierre Png love story). They should avoid unnecessary details that are not relevant to the central argument (e.g. “Pierre Png’s donating half his liver was a romantic gesture; the Indian lady was 40 years old…).

5. Students should get their facts straight (e.g. ‘Slim 10’ caused liver failure, not liver cancer, heart failure, kidney failure …; so far only 1 person has died, not several; the person who died was an Indian lady, not a Malay girl …).

6. The Singaporean students’ lack of knowledge about their own country is really appalling. For example, many students assumed that only the Chinese have their own herbal remedies. A couple of students even went so far to state that “today the Chinese are slowly influencing the other races to try out herbal remedies.” Obviously, National Education has not really worked!

7. It would be great to see students qualifying their ideas and not making sweeping generalizations such as “all women are vain” (surely not all women? and men are not?), “slimming pills will appeal to ignorant housewives” (why should housewives be ignorant? surely slimming pills appeal to all sectors of society, too?); “the uneducated and the illiterate are of course swayed by aggressive advertisements” (and the highly educated professionals are not?)

8. Students must organise their points as if they are writing an essay. Each paragraph should contain a topic sentence/ main idea, followed by explanation and supporting evidence. Students should make use of linkers to ensure cogency. They should not be throwing in ideas haphazardly.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Answers for JCT 2001

Passage A

1. With reference to paragraph one, why does the writer believe that even men who treat women equally and respectfully "may adopt a posture of dominance toward her when other men are around" (l.5-6)? [2]+1g

Lifts Paraphrased Answer
"From boyhood, males are bombarded…” (l. 1)


"So powerful and pervasive is this formula… when other men are around" (l.3-6) • The idea that men who are truly men are superior to women is one deeply entrenched in the minds of all boys [1]
• So that even when they respect women as equals, [bonus:1/2]
• they feel the need to return to that stereotype when in the presence of other males to establish a sense of superiority/manliness. [1]

Comments

An inference is required of lines “depend on the opinions of other men” with an explanation in their own words
Instead :
a) there was lifting of key terms: “real” men, “manhood”
b) or word substitution given with this as a typical case : men relies ( ‘depends’) on the views (‘opinions’) of other males (men’) and the presence (‘existence’) of the targeted (‘subjected’) group in question
c) there was the inclusion of the last part of the paragraph (‘existence ……group’) which is irrelevant to the question.

Almost 95% of answers used this Singlish expression “since young”, an error highlighted by the Cambridge examiners in their reports.


2. From paragraph two, explain the meaning of the phrase "dominating a
lowly 'dog' or 'cow' can hardly be very satisfying". [3]+1g

Lifts Paraphrased Answer
"domination of a woman… superior" (l.10-11)

"to justify abusive treatment of women… men must view them as a separate species" (l.12-14)

" [but] the formula achieves its goal only fleetingly" (l.16) • Men believe that by controlling women, they are made more powerful. In order to make it acceptable for them to subjugate the women they love, men convince themselves that women are inferior creatures. [1/2]
• However, this is effective only for a while. [1]
• There is no pleasure to be gained from dominating such inferior creatures because it does not at all prove men's superiority. [1/2]


Comments

Answers were muddled and contradictory as students found it difficult to explain and reconcile the paradox in this situation.
The analogy used to compare the position/lot of women and animals was also ill understood and many actually took this literally and thought that comparing women to animals was meant as a contrast to show how controlling an animal and controlling a woman are different and that it was far more challenging and therefore more satisfying to control a human, an intelligent woman!
Another distortion was in emphasising that men who are actually very much in love with their women are driven by guilt and therefore are unable to feel fulfillment in their relationship.


3. According to the writer in the third paragraph, can women ever truly be the "obedient dog" that men want them to be? [2]+1g

Lifts Paraphrased Answer
"has capacities for independent thought, action, speech, and creativity” (l. 24-25)

“that militate against easy consignment of her to inferior status" (l.25) • Women have the ability to be intelligent and talented [1]
• and even if they were willing to [1/2]
• it remains very difficult for any man to force them into becoming anything less than what they are. [1/2]


Comments

i. Most students misinterpreted women’s ability to be intelligent and talented as “a freedom to think” or “their right”. Some simply answered that women “have independent thinking”.

ii. Many answers were lifted from the passage. Students should know that giving such answers are a waste of time because no marks will be awarded.

"It is because even a woman who is willing to be an "obedient dog" has the ability to behave in a manner that frees her from being considered lower than men. This ability is so powerful that even if men try to make women feel small and useless, they would fail." (Ang Huay Sin, 13/01)


4. From the fourth paragraph, explain the oppression men feel they are subjected to and the relationship between this oppression and that forced on women. [3]+1g

Lifts Paraphrased Answer
“Most men do not make policy…
Most men serve as dogs, bulls, robots to their masters” (l.32-34)
“… are not responsible…government policy or economic disadvantage or war " (l. 35)
"…that like women, they are oppressed” (l.36) • They are not the ones who make the rules. Instead, they work for those who make the rules / are subservient to higher authorities. [1]
• Like women who serve as lowly creatures to men, they see themselves as lowly creatures serving those truly in power. [1]
• This therefore translates into a rationale / motivation / justification / reason for their oppression of women. [1]


Comments

i. Almost all students could see that the oppression forced on most men was a result of their being subservient to higher authorities.

ii. However, those who correctly answered that men and women share a similar relationship in being oppressed could not infer that men use their oppression as a reason for their own domination over women. Most of those who could make the inference did not explain the similar oppression.

iii. Again, too many answers were lifted from the passage. It was also obvious that in some cases lifting was done without understanding. E.g. "men are responsible for government policy or economic disadvantage or war and this is why they are oppressed."


Passage B


5. Give the meaning of each of the following words as they are used in the passage. You may write the answer in a word or a short phrase. [5]+1g

1m ½ m 0m

seclusion
(line 1) noun

isolation
being kept apart
confinement
being cut off
living apart
living alone

privacy (root word found in text)
exclude
voluntary withdrawal
status
staying away
relation
blocked off

compensated (line 24) verb

remunerated to lessen the negative effects of discrimination
paid/repaid for her loss


given something
rewarded
reimbursed
given
returned

renounce (line 40)
verb

give up/surrender/
disclaim relationship with

Reject
Make invalid
Ignore
Change
Re-instate
Re-identify
Show
Declare
discard
deny


foreign (line 42)
adjective

not familiar/not belonging naturally
alien
strange Unknown
New
Unusual
Different
distant

complicated (line 43) verb

Made more difficult
Made complex
Made worse
Made confusing
Made unclear Messed up
Abstract
Made sophisticated


Strengths:

In general, the meaning of words were understood and reflected in the answers.
Better students paid close attention to achieving accuracy in the meaning as
well as the word form.

Areas for improvement:

• Spelling errors - seperation (separation), repayed (repaid), ailen (alien), surender (surrender) etc.
• More than ONE answers - some had 3 answers and all 3 were conflicting in
meaning.
• Incorrect and sloppily written word forms - complexed (no such word exists), made up for, messy etc.


6 (a) From the first paragraph, why does the writer argue that "the widespread availability of contraception and abortion are returning [the woman] to that impossible role: being a woman" (l.4-5)? [2]+1g

Lifts Paraphrased Answer
“And if contraception and abortion are spoken of most often as possible ways of controlling, or even “mastering,” the birth rate, of being a mother “by choice,” the fact remains that they imply the possibility of modifying women’s social status” (l.5-9) • With the freedom to choose when to conceive as well as whether or not they want a baby, [1]
• they are now free to leave behind the roles of housewife and mother and focus on defining herself in other ways. [1]

Strengths:
Many students were able to offer accurate answers expressed in their own words.

For example, an answer adapted from Chan Li Yan (30/01)

"It gives females the freedom to decide when they want to have children. This has a
great significance as it may be able to change the perceived notions of the role of
women in society".

• Wholesale and partial lifting - using key words from the passage to illustrate an
important issue
• Obscure and sweeping interpretations - "women can now kill their babies and not
get pregnant"
• Mis-interpretation of question - Some attempted to explain the claim in the quotation although the question does not really want this.


(b) In paragraph three, according to the writer, how are women "products"? [2]+1g

Lifts Paraphrased Answers
“their status is that of merchandise, ‘commodities’” (l.29)


“How can … such objects of use…claim right to speak…?” (l. 29-31)
“Commodities…if they could talk…So women have to remain an ”infrastructure” …unrecognised” (l.31-34) • The writer feels that men see women not as fellow human beings but as inanimate items meant for utilisation and exchange. [1]
• Women have long been kept silent by men and by their silence, they are seen as products and not humans. [1]

Comments

- Students over-inferred and concluded that women were "sex objects" who were being "toyed with by men."
- "Products" was paraphrased as "tools" but this was unacceptable as in the passage, women were not depicted as being used by men to achieve an end but were merely not being treated as human beings
- No relation was made between the inability of women to voice their opinions and how this was similar to the characteristic of products
- Lifting occurred frequently
- Phrasing was inaccurate. “Women as products without the right to speak” was paraphrased as “women cannot talk / have no ability to speak.” This implies a physical defect rather than a social condition.


7. The writer believes that there are two possible roles available to women. Write a summary to show how these two roles differ from each other and the problems women face when trying to fit into these roles. Use material from paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 only. [8]+4g

Organize your answers so as to bring out pairs of contrast between the two roles.

Do not merely list the differences in an isolated fashion.

Write no more than 150 words. Use your own words as far as possible.

Lifts Paraphrased Answer
“The woman, traditionally… has long been nothing but a mother.” (l.1-2)
“entrance into the circuits of production” (l.3) A1-A2 Women, who were once kept in the house / feminine / maternal, [1]
are now being freed to work / men's economic equals. [1]
"Woman could be man's equal… same economic, social, political rights as men…potential man" (l.13-15) B1-B2 They can choose gender equity / have the same position and status as men, [1/2]
And have congruent advantages / benefits; [1/2]
"woman would also have to preserve and maintain what is called femininity" (l.17-18) B3-B4 or they can continue having the appearance [1/2]
of being pretty and delicate. [1/2]
"But in fact that "femininity" is a role, an image, a value, imposed upon women by male systems of representation." (l.20-21)

"loses herself by playing on her femininity" (l.23) B5 and these stereotypes were defined by men [1/2]



and women who attempt to fit into this role find themselves trying to become something they are not [1/2]

"The value of a woman would accrue to her from her maternal role" (l.18) B6 A female's worth is only determined by her position as a mother[1/2]

"this masquerade [of femininity] requires an effort for which she is not compensated" (l.23-24) B7 She is not rewarded in accordance with the amount of work put into being feminine [1/2]
"woman does not have access to language" (l.44) C9 A woman has no control over language [1/2]

"except through recourse to "masculine" systems of representation" (l.44)
"which disappropriate her from her relation to herself and to other women." (l.45-46) C10 but one developed by and for men [1/2]

This disallows her expression on her own terms and alienates / isolates her from other women[1/2]
The feminine... is never to be identified except by and for the masculine…” (l.46-47) C11 Because what she says is only given recognition in relation to male ideas / concepts / a man's world [1/2]

Comments

Content

- "Padding" to the summary is not required. E.g. "There are two possible roles available to women." Students should not waste words on phrases that do not garner them marks.
- Students read too much into the passage and drew out a lot of non-existent sexual content. (E.g. "Women are prostitutes who are only used for sexual exchanges") Although inference is expected at times, students should be aware that a summary generally calls for an extraction of information already provided in the passage in the student's own words.
- Misreading of the passage occurred frequently. Students thought that having no "access to language" meant that women were uneducated.
- Above all, some students failed to answer the question directly; i.e. 1) The roles of women, 2) the problems women face. The summary became a mere paraphrase of all the information found in the passage as students included descriptions of contraception without explaining how it is a problem.

Language
- Widespread lifting
- The word "effeminate" does not have the same meaning as "feminine".
- "Feminism" is an ideology that supports the emancipation of women and egalitarianism. It does not refer to women being feminine.
- The spelling of "feminine" and "femininity" needs to be improved. ("femine", "famine", "feminity", etc)
- Conjunction: Words such as "whereas", "and" and "but" are to be used in the middle of a sentence to join two clauses, NOT at the beginning of a sentence. (E.g. The worth of a woman stems from her ability to conceive whereas the value of a man is not based on his virility.)
- Concordance: Students were unable to be consistent about the subject used in the sentence. (E.g. Women [plural] are regarded as potential men. She has the same status as him.)


8. French and Irigaray look at the different ways men assert control over women. Identify two such issues that arise and which are common to both writers. Discuss how these issues would be of particular concern to your own society. Draw appropriate information from the texts. However, you should rely largely on your own relevant ideas and experience in order to justify your answer. [8]+4g


Comments:

Answers should have an analysis of some of the possible ramifications (i.e. the implications of the possible effects) that these issues would have on the society; however scripts tended to describe signs of the existence of these issues/situations i.e. they tried to prove that these conditions of abuse and exploitation were happening here, referring to news reports of cases of rape , assault etc. There should be some attempt at examining the implications of such conditions if allowed to develop and also whether in fact we are going that route. Is there subtle exploitation /discrimination as expressed in our social norms and expectations? Evidence of this if any…. effects on our society….

Many students cheerfully ignored both parts of the questions, picking on any issue particular to just one writer not “common to both” as required, and also cited a variety of examples of other societies.

This is one question in which the relevance of the second half of the question hinges on the first and if the first is out of point then the value of the rest that follows is negated. Similarly, even though the points are valid and cogent ones but unrelated to one’s “own society”, again, the material cannot gain credit.

Many answers merely regurgitated the ideas from the 2 passages.

Students were clearly confused by the question itself: the question-statement asks for 2 “issues” while the introductory sentence asks for “ways”.

It is deemed that the abstract, philosophical, somewhat convoluted nature of the ideas and sophistication of thought of the passages with the subtle use of figurative terms is quite out of the grasp of Year 1 students.


Explanation:

Students must be able to identify issues common to both writers.
Students must show understanding of the issues they choose and the thrust of
the writer’s argument.
Students should choose issues wisely as several tend to overlap e.g. the idea of women being forced into an inferior position would already be encompassed in that of men controlling women.

• The only role available to women (without male control or intervention) is that of a mother
A: “men must ally solidly against women, creating institutions that foreclose all roles to women except breeder-servanthood.” (lines 26-28)
B: “The women, traditionally…have long been nothing but mothers.” (lines 1-2)

• Men control women by determining how they should behave
A: “a man… may adopt a posture of dominance toward her when other men are around.” (lines 4-6)
B: “femininity” is a role…imposed upon women by male systems of representation.” (lines 20-21)

• Men make it almost impossible for women to enter their world

• Women are not seen as equals by men
A: women seen as animals
B: women considered commodities

• Men abuse women by taking them as sexual objects
A: “Women are thus in a situation of specific exploitation with respect to […] sexual exchanges” (lines 37-38)
B: “he can rape women, whether mate, acquaintance, or stranger; he can rape or sexually molest his daughters, stepchildren, or the children of a woman he claims to love.” (lines 50-53)

They should be able to make connections between the arguments presented in both passages and the local situation, for example:

• instances where women quit their jobs after marriage at the insistence of their husbands to look after the house and the family;

• female stereotypes rooted in the way Singaporeans see women e.g. entries to a photography competition held earlier this year with the theme ‘women at work’ mainly focused on women working at jobs long seen to be dominated by women such as modeling, cleaning and cooking.

• Singaporean women still do not share equal benefits and privileges as their male counterparts in the working world.

They should also be able to examine the significance / impact / effect of these examples on Singaporean society.

Students should also get their facts right. Some common mistakes include arguing that:
- there is compulsory education in Singapore for both boys and girls
- prostitution is illegal in Singapore
- there is no physical abuse of women in Singapore

Some students also obviously did not put much thought into their reasoning process:
 There is gender equity in Singapore because more people now consent to and engage in premarital sex.
 Women today are only feminine during sexual intercourse.

Coherence:
Students must present their answers in distinct and linked paragraphs leading to a logical conclusion, showing a clear line of argument. The answers must be consistently focused on the requirements: identification of issues and evaluation with illustration from the Singaporean context.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments