Answers for the June Hol Compre Practice: 2003 Promos
2. In paragraph 2, the writer says that Malthus’ prediction still stirs much debate today. Explain the two viewpoints that it generates. [4]
LIFTED PHRASES PARAPHRASE
Basically, the Pollyannas of this world say that Malthus was wrong (l.
the population has continued to grow, economies remain robust (l.
and famines in Biafra and Ethiopia are more aberrations than signs of the future. (l.9–11)
The Pollyannas say the more the merrier; (l.13-14)
Cassandras reply that Malthus was right (l.
but techno-fixes have postponed the day of reckoning. (l. 12-13)
the Cassandras say that is already twice as many as can be supported in middle-class comfort (l.
and the world is running out of arable land and fresh water. (l. 14-16) A
One group feels that Malthus was incorrect [1/2]
despite population increase, [1/2] economies in general have been strong / robust. [1/2]
Famines that occur are exceptions. [1/2]
In fact, the more people the better for the world. [1/2]
The other group feels that Malthus was correct. [1/2]
However, technology has delayed the outcomes of his predictions. [1/2]
Furthermore, they see that the world has already more people than it can comfortably support [1/2]
and its resources are being depleted rapidly. [1/2]
Any 8 out of 9 points
Mark range: 1½ – 4
Language Marks: 4 (Combined with Q3 & Q7)
COMMENTS:
Strengths
This is a straightforward direct question that requires students to clearly identify two view points with regards to Malthus’ Theory. Except for a minority who managed to get the view points mixed up, most were able to scored decent content marks.
There were some scripts which showed good grasp of English/vocabulary and managed to paraphrase the key words/phrases smoothly.
Weaknesses
Weaker students tend to lapse into past tense for everything, e.g., “The writer said ….”
Lifting was quite common. Despite the absence of explicit instructions in the question itself, students must remember the general instructions at the beginning of the answer booklet.
Some answers were too wordy or repetitive.
Marked by: Mr Peck CS
3. In paragraph 5, why does the writer say that agriculture ‘removed the Malthusian lid in one fell swoop’? (l. 40) [3]
LIFTED PHRASES PARAPHRASE
Agriculture altered how we related to the natural world … (l. 39)
… liberating us from the confines of the local ecosystem … (l. 39)
… one fell swoop (l. 40)
The constraints that Malthus predicted do not apply today. [1]
Modern agricultural practices/ technology have/has freed us from our dependence on the natural environment for our needs [1]
all at once [1]
Mark range: 1 – 3
Language Marks: 4 (Combined with Q2 & Q7)
COMMENTS:
Strengths
Only a few students managed to address all parts of the quoted phrase, especially “in one fell swoop”.
Weaknesses
As with Q2, weaker students tend to lapse into past tense for everything, e.g., “The writer said ….” despite the wording in the question - “… why does the writer say…”
Some answers even concluded that agriculture actually reinforced the Malthusian Theory.
Lifting was quite common.
Time management appeared to be a problem for some as there were some scripts which left this question unattempted.
Some answers were too wordy or repetitive.
Marked by: Mr Peck CS
5. Explain the phrase ‘our rampant success in living outside the world’s ecosystems has put them all, and thus ourselves, in jeopardy’ (ll. 71-72). [2 + 1 lang]
LIFTED PHRASES PARAPHRASE
our rampant success in living outside the world’s ecosystems has put them all, and thus ourselves, in jeopardy (l. 71-72)
We have managed to live highly independently [1/2]
of our natural environment. [1/2]
However, our great achievement in doing so/ even though we have thrived [1/2], this
has endangered the existence of these resources and our own existence [1/2].
Explanation of irony – a situation that has an unexpected ending [Bonus 1/2]
Mark range: 0 – 2
COMMENTS:
Many students just re-arranged the phrase and then went on to write about something else.
Lifting important words like ‘rampant success’, ‘jeopardy’
Most however, could at least explain that man is no longer dependent on the natural environment.
Marked by: Ms Faye Tan
0 comments:
Post a Comment